Chennai/ New Delhi: The Mudgal report said that Srinivas was aware of the violation by Individual 3 but no action was taken. The misdemeanours of the players are not being dealt with in the case of the Cricket Association of Bihar versus the BCCI.
For the record, the report, made public by the Supreme Court on Monday, cleared Srinivasan of betting, spot and match-fixing, something that he was not being investigated for anyway. But the more surprising revelation was that of IPL Chief Opertaing Officer Sundar Raman. The report says Raman, who is a well known confidant of Srinivasan, “knew a contact of a bookie and had contacted him eight times in one season.”
Listed as Individual 12 in the report, Raman said he knew the person “but however claimed to be unaware of his connection with betting activities.” His position as an officer of the BCCI becomes untenable now, but the question is will a reconstituted board with the president back take action against his close associate, who is the IPL COO.On Meiyyappan, the report noted:
“Investigations have confirmed that this individual (Gurnath Meiyappan) was a team official of a franchise. He was frequently meeting Individual 2 (name withheld) in his hotel room. This strengthens the conclusion of the committee in its interim report dated February 10 that he was in close touch with Individual 2.”
Individual 2 is obviously a prominent player of the Chennai Super Kings. In this case too, Srinivasan is culpable of not acting to correct the situation. The other major count of misdemeanor against Srinivasan, is that he tried to shield his son-in-law as a mere ‘cricket enthusiast’ when he well knew the real position of how Meiyyappan was sitting in the players’ dugout and how he was privy to team strategies as he was often in close attendance at the team’s IPL events. Meiyyappan, the report says, was a team official, if not the de facto owner, of CSK.
According to the bye-law 11.3(c) (Clause says the agreement can be terminated if, “the Franchise, any Franchise Group Company and/or any owner acts in any way which has a material adverse effect upon the reputation or standing of the League, BCCI-IPL, BCCI, the Franchise, the team (or any other team in the League) and/or the game of cricket.) of the IPL, which is a property of BCCI and registered under the Societies Act of Tamil Nadu, a team can be disqualified.
