‘PM secular friends remark is shocking’ says Congress' Sanjay Jha
Mr Jha said the Prime Minister's comments made secularists laughing stock to the world
New Delhi: Hitting at Prime Minister Narendra Modi for his “secular friends” comment, the Congress on Wednesday said, such jibes on foreign soil were “shocking and ungracious” and had made India a “laughing stock” in Japan.
In a Twitter post Congress spokesperson Sanjay Jha said, “Shocking & unbecoming of a Prime Minister to mock secularism on foreign soil, when communal temperatures raised by his own party in India.”
Shocking & unbecoming of a Prime Minister to mock secularism on foreign soil, when communal temperatures raised by his own party in India.
— Sanjay Jha (@JhaSanjay) September 3, 2014
Not mincing words, Mr Jha said Mr Modi was “beating the communal drum-beat in Japan” and the “mocking” of a serious issue of secularism is “ungracious, unacceptable, unexpected”.
He said, “The ferocious communal cat is out of the bag, officially! PM Modi ridicules secularists in India in Japan. We must be a laughing stock there.”
Beating the communal drum-beat in Japan, Mr Prime Minister, by mocking a serious issue of secularism is ungracious, unacceptable, unexpected
— Sanjay Jha (@JhaSanjay) September 3, 2014
His tweets drew reactions from twitterati in support of the ruling party.
Mr Modi had an audience with Emperor Akihito on Tuesday at the Imperial Palace in Tokyo on the fourth day of his five-day visit to Japan to strengthen bilateral ties.
Addressing the members of the Indian community at a reception there, Mr Modi had said he had carried a copy of the Gita to gift to the Emperor.
“For gifting I brought a Gita. I do not know what will happen in India after this. There may be a TV debate on this. Our secular friends will create toofan (storm) that what does Mr Modi think of himself? He has taken a Gita with him that means he has made this one also communal,” the Prime Minister had said.
As the remarks were greeted with a round of applause, Mr Modi hastened to add, “Anyway, they should also have their livelihood and if I am not there, then how will they earn their livelihood?”