Coal scam: Court to hear JICPL's case on September 28

The court asked investigating officer to supply all the documents to the accused

Update: 2015-09-07 17:36 GMT
The court asked CBI's investigating officer to supply all the documents to the accused(Photo: PTI)

New Delhi: A special court fixed September 28 for hearing a coal scam case pertaining to  alleged irregularities in allocation of Mahuagarhi coal block  in Jharkhand to accused firm M/s Jas Infrastructure Capital  Pvt Ltd (JICPL). The court asked the CBI's investigating officer (IO) to supply all the documents to the accused, including former Coal  Secretary H C Gupta, before the next date of hearing.  After the IO said he had supplied the documents, Special  CBI Judge Bharat Parashar said "documents have been supplied  do the accused. Put up for scrutiny of documents on September  28." He however asked the IO to ensure that proper and legible  documents were provided to the accused. 

The court had earlier granted bail to Gupta, two senior  public servants K S Kropha and K C Samria and businessman  Director Manoj Kumar Jayaswal in the case.  The court had on July 31 issued summons to these accused  after taking cognisance of CBI's final report for the alleged  offences punishable under section 120-B (criminal conspiracy)  read with sections 409 (criminal breach of trust by public  servant), 420 (cheating) of IPC and under relevant provisions  of Prevention of Corruption Act.  The court had earlier refused to accept the CBI's closure report filed in the case and had directed it to further  investigate the matter. 

It had earlier noted that it was prima facie clear that  officers of Ministry of Coal or the screening committee had  acted in a manner which was "detrimental" to public interest  and they allowed JAS Infrastructure and Power Ltd, now known  as JICPL, to "misappropriate" nationalised natural resources. The agency had filed a closure report in the case in which it had lodged an FIR against Jas Infrastructure and  Power Ltd, Manoj Jayaswal and others for alleged  irregularities by the firm in acquiring coal block.  The FIR was lodged on the allegation that the company had  not disclosed to the Ministry of Coal that it was already in  possession of coal block.

Similar News