Thrash out differences, says Madras High Court
Contemnors to appear before judge and tender apology on Monday
By : p.arul
Update: 2015-11-19 06:49 GMT
Chennai: The Madras high court has observed that courts cannot function without Bar members and Bar members cannot function without courts. Advocates have to iron out their differences by mutual understanding and discussions.
Closing suo motu contempt proceedings against four advocates of Rameswaram in Ramanathapuram district, a division bench of Justices Satish K. Agnihotri and P. Devadass said advocates should not impede running of courts.
On March, 17, K. Ramamoorthy, secretary, R. Dominic Ravi and K. Mayilsamy, executive members of advocates’ association, Rameswaram and G. Prabakaran, advocate, locked the entrance to the district munsif- cum— judicial magistrate court building and prevented the magistrate G.N. Saravanakumar, court staff and others from entering the court. The advocates abused the magistrate in filthy language and disrupted court proceedings. Initiating suo motu contempt proceedings on a report by the Principal district judge, the Madras High court issued notice to the Chairman, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry.
R.C.Paul Kanagaraj, counsel for the contemnors, submitted that the style of functioning of the then judicial magistrate irritated everyone. The bench directed the four contemnors to appear before the district munsif cum judicial magistrate, Rameswaram on November 23 at 10.30 a.m., in open court and tender an unconditional apology. The bench directed the chairman, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry that in future, if the advocates indulge in similar activities, strict disciplinary action should be taken.
Download the all new Deccan Chronicle app for Android and iOS to stay up-to-date with latest headlines and news stories in politics, entertainment, sports, technology, business and much more from India and around the world.