CJI backs move to reject Justice K M Joseph

Centre says his promotion may not be “appropriate”, needs to be reconsidered.

Update: 2018-04-26 19:50 GMT
The Collegium said it has 'carefully considered' observations made by Law Minister and nothing adverse was pointed on Joseph's suitability. (Photo: File)

New Delhi: The government on Thursday turned down a Supreme Court collegium proposal to elevate Justice K.M. Joseph to the top court, saying his promotion may not be “appropriate” and needs to be reconsidered, a decision that evoked sharp reactions from legal fraternity and opposition parties.

The government’s stand on 59-year-old Joseph, Uttrakhand High Court Chief Justice who has over two years of service left, is being seen as widening of the rift between the executive and the judiciary, which have been at loggerheads over issues like appointment and transfer of judges.

However, the government received immediate support from the collegium head, Chief Justice Dipak Misra, who said the executive was well within its rights to reject Justice Joseph’s name while accepting the second name even though both were recommended for elevation together by the collegium.

Won’t be fair to more deserving CJS: Centre
The government on Thursday turned down a Supreme Court collegium proposal to elevate Justice K.M. Joseph to the top court, saying his promotion may not be “appropriate” and needs to be reconsidered, a decision that evoked sharp reactions from legal fraternity and opposition parties. The names of Malhotra and Justice Joseph were recommended by the collegium in January.

In a letter to Justice Misra, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said the government's decision that the collegium should reconsider its proposal for Justice Joseph's elevation has approval of the President and the Prime Minister. Making its case, Prasad also flagged that the SCs/STs have no representation in the apex court since long while Kerala High Court, Joseph's parent court, is sufficiently represented in the top judiciary.

Prasad said the proposed appointment of Joseph “at this stage does not appear to be appropriate” and it would also not be “fair and justified to other more senior, suitable and deserving Chief Justices” and senior judges of various High Courts. The government's decision evoked reactions.

Similar News