Rahul Gandhi, derided as soft in the head by a committed but unprincipled social media army (directed by an invisible hand), with sniper support from regulars, stunned detractors when he made quite a decent speech at the University of California in Berkeley recently.
He answered probing questions from the campus audience with candour, unlike devious politicians who are deemed serious and capable as they offer opaque answers with double meanings that send out self-congratulatory messages to followers and mean threats to opponents. Throughout, the Congress leader displayed a lack of rancour, a touch of wit, and due regard for decorum.
This was enough to set the cat among the pigeons. Heavy artillery was deployed to dismantle Mr Gandhi, although the Congressman is routinely lampooned as inadequate and inept by the BJP-RSS. BJP chief Amit Shah made a quick jab below the belt. A Cabinet minister aimed poison darts. Smriti Irani, a regime favourite, used her Cabinet position to hog television time as she shot missiles dripping with venom at the Congress leader.
This comes naturally to Ms Irani, who made bold to assert that while some people had to work hard to reach where they’d got, the dynast had got everything on a platter. Naturally, people are curious to know in what positions this minister has toiled to bag plum Cabinet posts after losing her Lok Sabha election.
It is clear to everyone — even Narendra Modi’s Cabinet colleagues — that the PM couldn’t have pulled off the trick that RG did. He is short on intellectual fibre. He is good at something else though, else he wouldn’t have been able to cash in on people’s urge for a “strong leadership”.
He brags without inhibition (Lord Krishna would have disapproved), he calls himself “Son of India”, he says those who preceded him were “against progress”, and he has worn a coat in public that cost lakhs of rupees (betraying a deep-seated sense of anxiety behind the bold facade). These unusual attributes in the top leader were lapped up by the masses. They thought they had found their man. He seemed to attack the elites. They were certain he would look after their interests.
But that time is now past. Mr Modi looks defeated when he takes the stage these days. He proffers jaded propaganda — such as farmers’ incomes will double in five years; this at a time when more farmers are committing suicide every day across India than ever before. Also, when employment is rapidly shrinking.
No wonder Mr Modi doesn’t answer any questions, leave alone searching ones. He has no time for journalists, even less for his own MPs and ministers, who bow and scrape before him as before a sultan of yore, worried that they might be ejected from the gravy train otherwise.
External affairs minister Sushma Swaraj offered a typical example recently. At the UN General Assembly, she covered the routine on Pakistan being the home of terrorism, and then launched into the PM’s fulsome praise for programmes such as Stand Up India and what have you, as she might at an election rally. “Good Luck India! Good Bye India!” One can almost hear that coming! Modi’s India looks badly faded. It is divided and despairing.
In the three years Mr Modi has been around as PM, he has used the state apparatus to intimidate opponents. In his name, thugs have let loose repression on Muslims, the dalit community (although the PM courts B.R. Ambedkar flagrantly, hoping to win dalit votes), poor tribal people, holders of contrary opinion, and intellectuals.
The return of state awards by prestigious writers, thinkers, artistes and the hit-style murders of rationalists and dissenting journalists inspired nationwide protests, but the bhakts or regime supporters are unfazed. Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Turkey has despatched opponents to jail. We are not there yet. But the age of fear is upon us, and the age of attacks on the nation’s poorest. This takes us beyond authoritarianism — to a place from which quasi-fascism does not look so far.
The State’s hungry beasts have been let loose on a particular television station, which in recent times has attempted to do straightforward, old-fashioned, journalism instead of keeling over like the rest and becoming a servitor of the regime. The CBI is now a monster unchained. A former IAS officer and now a well-known activist for communal harmony, now touring the country with young people to spread the message of societal peace, is being threatened by the tax brutes.
As for the PM’s ability to guide the country with sophistication and intellect (a requirement in a complex society like India), it will suffice to explore the contents of his “Mann Ki Baat” programme. There is no need to dissect crucial issues like demonetisation, GST, “surgical strike”, Swachchh Bharat, Stand Up India, etc.
No wonder every economic metric points to a tired, shrinking economy with little hope of recovery in the foreseeable future. People are seething with discontent. The farmers are in revolt. The BJP’s student wing, the ABVP, has lost university elections across India, although the important tests lie in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. When the PM was in Varanasi, his constituency, last week, over 1,000 BHU women students protested life under the regime, including pointing to sexual violence, but Mr Modi had no time for them. They were lathicharged. The friendly media looked the other way.
The PM and his cohorts give the call to protect India’s honour and self-respect through militarism. Their way is to pay overt obeisance to the armed forces. The establishment speaks of placing tanks at university campuses to inculcate a healthy dose of patriotism among young people. Any day one expects ministers to arrive at Cabinet meetings wearing jackboots and epaulettes. But can you honour the soldier when you dishonour the farmer? Isn’t the jawan the “kisan in uniform”?
