Li and Xu began dating in 2018 and had been in a stable relationship until 2020 when Li discovered that Xu was having an affair with his nephew. The revelation caused a significant rift between the couple, leading to the relationship’s end.
Following the breakup, Xu attempted to mend the situation by transferring 300,000 Yuan to Li as a gesture of remorse. However, their fallout escalated when Xu later demanded that Li return the money, claiming the payment was not a gift but a temporary transfer.
The case was taken to court, where Xu argued for the repayment of the amount. Li, on the other hand, maintained that the money was given as compensation for the emotional distress caused by Xu’s betrayal.
The court sided with Li, ruling that the amount was indeed a gift and that there was no obligation for him to return it. The judgment emphasized that the payment was voluntary and meant as a token of apology, not a loan or conditional transfer.
The case has sparked debates online, with many users discussing the dynamics of relationships and the legalities of financial exchanges between couples. The incident highlights the complex interplay of emotions, ethics, and law in personal disputes.
The ruling reaffirms that voluntary gifts made without explicit agreements cannot be reclaimed in similar circumstances, as per Chinese legal standards.
